Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is just a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, with an 87.1 score against 81.3. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is notably newer than the LG V35 ThinQ's, but it's heavier and somewhat thicker. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a little bit better screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a lot lower display density and a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a quite bigger screen.
LG V35 ThinQ has a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better storage to store more apps and games than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior camera than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has better video frame rate, a lot higher 50 MP resolution camera and a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has superior battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.