Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-12-07 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | LTPS |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G has a score of 81.5, which is a little bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 overall score. The Moto G 5G body is newer than LG V35 ThinQ's, although it is extremely thicker and extremely heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ features a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a greater pixel number per inch of screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a quite bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit faster processor than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G 5G features just a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto G 5G also counts with a back camera with much more megapixels.
Motorola Moto G 5G has a very superior battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.