Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-07-08 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Surfing blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has an overall score of 82.6, which is a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 score. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus construction is incredibly newer, but thicker and notably heavier than the LG V35 ThinQ. LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a better pixel density.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little better hardware performance than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. LG V35 ThinQ features more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus captures much better pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a camera in the back with lot more megapixels and a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Moto G 5G Plus counts with a superior battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.