Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than Moto G Power's 76.1 general score. Despite of the fact that LG V35 ThinQ is older than the Moto G Power, it's construction is way thinner and incredibly lighter. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit more vivid screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and more pixels per display inch.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better processor than Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. LG V35 ThinQ features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto G Power features a really longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The Moto G Power's camera is very similar to LG V35 ThinQ's camera, because although the Moto G Power has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same (4K) video quality and a camera with a 16 mega-pixels, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto G Power. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the LG V35 ThinQ, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Motorola Moto G Power, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.