Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| 2018-06-08 | 2021-01-14 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.28 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 160.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than Moto G Power (2021)'s general score of 76.5. The LG V35 ThinQ is an much older phone than Moto G Power (2021), but LG could make it extremely thinner and noticeably lighter. LG V35 ThinQ features a lot better screen than Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a way higher screen pixel density.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little better hardware performance than Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. Moto G Power (2021) has a slightly better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing images or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Moto G Power (2021) also counts with a much better 48 MP resolution back camera, a lot larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and better 60 fps video frame rates.
LG V35 ThinQ has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto G Power (2021) features a superior battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G Power (2021), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G Power (2021). So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy LG V35 ThinQ, else you can save some dollars and get the Moto G Power (2021), giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.