Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| 2018-06-08 | 2021-01-14 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is a bit better than Moto G Stylus (2021)'s 79.3 score. The LG V35 ThinQ construction is much lighter and somewhat thinner than Moto G Stylus (2021), although it was released 3 years before. LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a higher pixels density. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Moto G Stylus (2021) takes slightly better pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also counts with a back camera with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with longer battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheap compared to the Moto G Stylus (2021).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.