Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2021-06-14 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.67 x 3.05 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.67 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Cosmic Emerald |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) is a little bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, having a overall score of 82.1 against 81.3. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) design is extremely newer than LG V35 ThinQ's, but it is extremely thicker and notably heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a higher screen density. Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) features a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) has slightly more memory to install applications and games than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) counts with a superior battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52% bigger battery size.
Although Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V35 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the LG V35 ThinQ, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.