Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2023-06-02 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 600 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)'s general score of 76. Even though LG V35 ThinQ is older than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), it's construction is incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023). Both of them have 8 processing cores and a 6 GB RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a sharper display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a higher display pixel density. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) shoots slightly better pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and a way tinier sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ features a better storage to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with a much longer battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.