Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-08 | -- |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto G60s's 79.9 score. LG V35 ThinQ is a notably thinner and a lot lighter cellphone than Motorola Moto G60s. LG V35 ThinQ has a little faster processor than Moto G60s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a better pixel number in each screen inch. The Motorola Moto G60s features a superior camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Moto G60s also counts with a camera with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution.
Motorola Moto G60s features a slightly bigger storage to install games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Moto G60s has a way better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.