Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| 2018-06-08 | 2016-07-28 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is just a bit better than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, having an 81.3 score against 76.4. LG V35 ThinQ's design is newer and just a bit lighter, but a little thicker than Moto Z Force Droid Edition. LG V35 ThinQ has a little more vivid screen than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a just a bit higher amount of pixels per display inch, a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a little bigger display.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit faster processor than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM. LG V35 ThinQ and Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition feature really similar memory capacity to install applications and games, both of them have equal internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition's camera is just as good as the camera in LG V35 ThinQ, because although the Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a much higher 21 MP resolution camera in the back.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a little better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.