Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| 2018-06-08 | 2017-08-10 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a score of 81.3 against 77.4. LG V35 ThinQ's design is newer, but thicker and a little heavier than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a quite larger screen, a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a just a little higher screen pixels density.
Moto Z2 Force Edition features as much storage to install games and applications as LG V35 ThinQ, both have the same 64 GB internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a tinier camera sensor capturing lower quality photographs and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better 16 MP resolution and a larger aperture.
The LG V35 ThinQ has improved battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 21 percent larger battery size.
LG V35 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.