Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2018-06-08 | 2018-08-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than the Moto Z3, having a general score of 81.3 against 77.6. LG V35 ThinQ is a just a little thicker and a little heavier phone than Moto Z3. LG V35 ThinQ has a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
The Moto Z3 counts with as much storage capacity to store more apps and games as the LG V35 ThinQ one, both of them have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 10% more battery capacity. LG V35 ThinQ takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z3, because although it has a smaller sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a larger diafragm aperture and a back camera with a much higher 16 megapixels resolution.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, LG V35 ThinQ is also cheaper than the Moto Z3, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.