Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| 2018-06-08 | 2018-06-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is slightly better than Moto Z3 Play's overall score of 76.3. The LG V35 ThinQ is a just a bit heavier and just a little thicker cellphone than Moto Z3 Play. LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better looking screen than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a higher number of pixels per inch of screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit faster CPU than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier sensor which offers a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a back facing camera with much more mega pixels and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures.
Moto Z3 Play features as much memory to store more games and applications as the LG V35 ThinQ one, both of them have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better battery performance than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.