Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2022-08-18 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and Gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than the Motorola razr (2022)'s score of 81.1. Despite of the fact that the LG V35 ThinQ is noticeably older than the Motorola razr (2022), it's design is a little bit thinner and noticeably lighter. Motorola razr (2022) features a bit better processing power than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a larger amount of RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel count per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2880px resolution. The Motorola razr (2022) has a much better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ features much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola razr (2022) has just a bit better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 3500mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.