Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2021-04-14 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Neo, having an 81.3 score against 76. LG V35 ThinQ's body is just a little thinner and somewhat lighter than OPPO Find X3 Neo, even though it was released 3 years before. OPPO Find X3 Neo has a little sharper screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a lot lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite worse quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite larger display.
LG V35 ThinQ has a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. OPPO Find X3 Neo features a little bit better hardware performance than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a greater amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo features improved battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a much better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rate and a back facing camera with a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.