Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2021-07-02 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than Galaxy A22, with an 81.3 score against 76.1. LG V35 ThinQ's body is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the Galaxy A22, even though it was released 3 years before. LG V35 ThinQ has a way better display than Galaxy A22, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better 1440 x 2880 resolution and way more pixels per display inch.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. LG V35 ThinQ features a better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A22, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A22. The LG V35 ThinQ takes a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A22, because although it has a way worse 16 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger aperture and a way better (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.