Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2018-06-08 | 2019-03-02 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A30's 79.6 general score. Although the LG V35 ThinQ and Galaxy A30 were released only 9 months apart, the LG V35 ThinQ is just a little thinner and a bit lighter. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy A30, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch of screen. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a smaller sensor, and they both have a 16 MP resolution back camera, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture and a much better (4K) video resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A30, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A30 features longer battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.