Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-04-27 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A31's 81.3 score. The LG V35 ThinQ construction is lighter and somewhat thinner than the Galaxy A31, even though it was released around 23 months before. LG V35 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. LG V35 ThinQ counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A31 has a way better battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent greater battery capacity. The Galaxy A31 captures clearer photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A31 also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a way larger camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.