Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2018-06-08 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ's score of 81.3. Samsung Galaxy A50's design is newer than LG V35 ThinQ's, but it's just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel amount per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 21% larger battery size. Galaxy A50 has a little bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor and a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
Galaxy A50 not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.