Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a score of 90.8, which is much better than the LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 score. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's construction is newer, but thicker and somewhat heavier than the LG V35 ThinQ. LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A51 5G. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G captures much better videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a way larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos and a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Galaxy A51 5G features a bit bigger storage capacity for apps and games than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features longer battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy A51 5G costs more money than LG V35 ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.