Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-08 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A70, getting an 81.3 score against 76.9. The LG V35 ThinQ construction is a bit thinner and lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A70, even though it was released around 11 months before. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy A70. Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. The LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A70, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ shoots a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor shooting worse quality pictures and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light photos.
The Galaxy A70 has improved battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the LG V35 ThinQ is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.