Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is much better than LG V35 ThinQ's overall score of 81.3. Galaxy A71 5G UW is a notably newer phone than LG V35 ThinQ, although it's somewhat thicker and heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A71 5G UW, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has superior battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 36 percent larger battery capacity. Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a very superior camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light images, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a much bigger camera sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality and a camera with way more MP.
Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V35 ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG V35 ThinQ, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.