Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2022-03-22 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | -- |
| Black and Gray | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F23 has an overall score of 84.6, which is a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 overall score. The Galaxy F23 is a way newer and much lighter phone than LG V35 ThinQ, although it's thicker. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy F23, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit better display than Galaxy F23, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. The LG V35 ThinQ has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy F23, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy F23 counts with a superior battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. LG V35 ThinQ takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less MP, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.