Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-10-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F41 is a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, with a global score of 85.2 against 81.3. The Galaxy F41 is a noticeably newer device than the LG V35 ThinQ, but it's somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better performance than Galaxy F41. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM and 8 processing cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and more pixels per screen inch. The LG V35 ThinQ features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy F41 features a way better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a camera with way more mega pixels and a much larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a much better battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.