Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-08 | 2017-09-15 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note8 has a general score of 83, which is a little bit better than LG V35 ThinQ's general score of 81.3. Although the Galaxy Note8 is better than LG V35 ThinQ, it must be told that it's also a thicker and heavier device. LG V35 ThinQ features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy Note8. Both of them have 8 cores and 6 GB of RAM. LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and videos and a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note8, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Note8's battery performance is just as good as the battery life in LG V35 ThinQ.
Although Galaxy Note8 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V35 ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Note8, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG V35 ThinQ, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.