Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-08 | 2019-05-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a general score of 93.6, which is better than the LG V35 ThinQ's overall score of 81.3. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a newer phone than the LG V35 ThinQ, but it is just a little thicker and heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G and LG V35 ThinQ both feature very similar processing units, and although the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a larger amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1440 x 2880, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The LG V35 ThinQ features a better memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a slightly better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a back camera with a much lower 12 megapixels resolution and a lower (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with improved battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G costs more money than LG V35 ThinQ, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.