Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2018-06-08 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is slightly better than LG V35 ThinQ's overall score of 81.3. The Galaxy S10e body is newer and just a little lighter, but also just a little thicker than the LG V35 ThinQ. LG V35 ThinQ has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a little bit greater pixel density, a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a little bit bigger screen.
Galaxy S10e counts with a processing unit that is very similar to the processing unit in LG V35 ThinQ, both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a way less megapixels camera in the back and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light photography and videos and a bigger back camera sensor.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S10e, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S10e is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V35 ThinQ. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S10e, otherwise you can save some money and buy the LG V35 ThinQ, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.