Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-08 | -- |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 5.57 ounces | -- |
| Black and Gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is better than LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 general score. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's body is way lighter and thinner than the LG V35 ThinQ. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better looking display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit worse number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little bit higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a bit larger screen.
LG V35 ThinQ features a much more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a better memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a really longer battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light images and video, it also counts with a lot better 200 MP resolution back facing camera, a much higher video resolution and a way larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.