Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2021-03-12 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than Galaxy XCover 5, getting a score of 81.3 against 78.1. LG V35 ThinQ's construction is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than Galaxy XCover 5, although it was released 3 years before. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a bit larger screen, a way higher screen pixels density and a way higher 1440 x 2880px resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ has just a little better performance than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a much higher (4K) video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.