Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2022-06-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Black and Gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, with a global score of 81.3 against 77.6. Even though LG V35 ThinQ is noticeably older than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, it's construction is noticeably lighter and extremely thinner. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a greater pixel quantity in each screen inch.
LG V35 ThinQ features a much better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro. Both have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a little bit more storage capacity for games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The LG V35 ThinQ takes clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a back facing camera with much less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing lot better quality photos and videos and a larger aperture to take better images and video in low light environments.
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has improved battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.