Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is slightly better than Galaxy XCover Pro's general score of 81. Even though LG V35 ThinQ is older than Galaxy XCover Pro, it's body is noticeably lighter and much thinner. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. LG V35 ThinQ shoots clearer photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a back camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better photos and video in low-light situations, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor and a much better (4K) video definition.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy XCover Pro features improved battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The LG V35 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.