Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than LG V35 ThinQ, with a 92.3 score against 81.3. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is much newer and just a little bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than LG V35 ThinQ. The LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880.
LG V35 ThinQ features a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit faster processor than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, a camera with a lot lower 12 mega pixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger camera sensor. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G's battery lifetime is very similar to the LG V35 ThinQ one.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V35 ThinQ. If you want to save some money, you can buy LG V35 ThinQ, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.