Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 global score. LG V35 ThinQ is an extremely older cellphone than the vivo X70 Pro, but LG was able to build it somewhat lighter and a little thinner anyway. The LG V35 ThinQ features a slightly better screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a better memory capacity for apps and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The vivo X70 Pro has just a bit better performance than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The vivo X70 Pro features superior battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4450mAh battery capacity. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a greater camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures, faster 60 fps video frame rate and a back facing camera with a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.