Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, having an 81.3 score against 81.1. LG V35 ThinQ is an older device than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, but LG could make it notably lighter and thinner. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. They have a Octa-Core CPU and a 6 GB RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. The LG V35 ThinQ has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures way better videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot more MP camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a superior battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, LG V35 ThinQ is also cheap compared to the other phone, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.