Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | ZTE |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-02-07 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Ochre and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is slightly better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro's score of 76.6. Although LG V35 ThinQ is older than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, it's construction is a little lighter and a little bit thinner. The LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better screen than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a CPU that is just as good as the LG V35 ThinQ one, both have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better camera than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a much tinier camera sensor which provides a lot worse photo and video quality and a way less MP back camera, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger camera aperture to take better photography in low-light environments.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a bit more storage to store more games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. ZTE Axon 10s Pro features superior battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 21 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.