Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2018-10-18 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3 XL's 80.7 global score. Even when the LG V40 ThinQ and the Google Pixel 3 XL were released with only 0 months difference, the LG V40 ThinQ is a little bit thinner and a little lighter. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a just a bit better pixel density, a little higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a little bit bigger screen.
LG V40 ThinQ has a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG V40 ThinQ has just a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit longer battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 3430mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The LG V40 ThinQ shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor which gives a lower image and video quality, a lesser mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light captures.
Although LG V40 ThinQ is a better device, it is a little more expensive than the Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3 XL. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 3 XL, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.