Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a, having a general score of 81.2 against 78.8. These phones include Android operating system, but LG V40 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11. Even though the LG V40 ThinQ and the Google Pixel 3a were only released with a couple of months difference, LG V40 ThinQ's body is heavier but also a bit thinner than the Google Pixel 3a.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a bit more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. LG V40 ThinQ has a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a little larger screen, a bit greater pixels quantity in each inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
LG V40 ThinQ has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, a lower 12 megapixels resolution back camera and a lower 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture. The LG V40 ThinQ features a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a little better battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
LG V40 ThinQ is a bit more expensive than the Google Pixel 3a, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.