Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is slightly better than the LG V40 ThinQ, getting an 82.9 score against 81.2. These phones have Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a has a newer 11 version while LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10. Even though the Google Pixel 4a is just a bit thicker than LG V40 ThinQ, it's somewhat lighter and newer.
LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel 4a. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU. The LG V40 ThinQ features just a bit better display than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a just a bit better pixels quantity in each display inch, a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a quite bigger display.
LG V40 ThinQ has a much greater storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V40 ThinQ captures a little bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier sensor taking lower quality photos and videos, a worse (4K) video quality and a lower resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better images in poorly lited situations.
The LG V40 ThinQ has just a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 3140mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V40 ThinQ. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a, else you can save a couple dollars and get the LG V40 ThinQ, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.