Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2018-10-18 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 537 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a score of 81.2, which is a bit better than the HTC U Ultra's global score of 77. LG V40 ThinQ is a newer device, and it's also just a little thinner and a little bit lighter than the HTC U Ultra. The LG V40 ThinQ features a little bit better screen than HTC U Ultra, because it has a just a bit greater pixel density, a quite larger display and a quite better 1440 x 3120 resolution.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a bit faster processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has a greater number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same resolution camera, the LG V40 ThinQ also counts with a larger camera aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited situations and better video frame rate.
The LG V40 ThinQ and the HTC U Ultra feature really similar memory capacity to store more apps and games, both of them have an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and the same 64 GB internal memory. LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a bit longer battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the LG V40 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.