Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, having a general score of 81.2 against 78.5. The LG V40 ThinQ is a just a little heavier cellphone than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but both have the same thickness. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but the LG V40 ThinQ has 10 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a little more vivid screen than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit worse screen density, it also counts with a quite larger screen. LG V40 ThinQ features a way better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a much better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos and video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a much bigger sensor.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features greater battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 33% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.