Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is slightly better than LG V40 ThinQ, with a general score of 87.1 against 81.2. Although Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is newer than the LG V40 ThinQ, it is heavier and thicker. Both phones in this review include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a newer 14 version and LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version, giving you some extra features and performance optimizations.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a bit sharper screen than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a lot lower pixels number per screen inch and a much lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with greater battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 36% larger battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures greater photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same video quality and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a lot better 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.