Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | LTPS |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G has a score of 81.5, which is slightly better than the LG V40 ThinQ's 81.2 global score. The Moto G 5G design is notably newer than the LG V40 ThinQ's, but it's incredibly heavier and notably thicker. Both phones in this comparison review have the same Android 10 OS, so they should give you all the same operating system features.
LG V40 ThinQ has a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a greater quantity of pixels per screen inch. The LG V40 ThinQ has a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Moto G 5G counts with a slightly better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Moto G 5G also counts with a lot better resolution camera. LG V40 ThinQ features a better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG V40 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Moto G 5G features a superior battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.