Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G Power, with an 81.2 score against 76.1. Both devices in this review have Android OS, but the LG V40 ThinQ has older 10 version while Motorola Moto G Power has Android 11 version. LG V40 ThinQ's design is lighter and notably thinner than Motorola Moto G Power, despite of the fact that it was released just 18 months before.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit better display than Moto G Power, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a higher pixel count in each inch of screen. LG V40 ThinQ has a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video resolution and a back-facing camera with lot less MP, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures and a larger aperture. The LG V40 ThinQ has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Moto G Power has a superior battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The LG V40 ThinQ costs more than the Motorola Moto G Power, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.