Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | -- |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has a general score of 81.2, which is slightly better than the Moto G60s's overall score of 79.9. LG V40 ThinQ is a notably thinner and incredibly lighter device than the Moto G60s. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but LG V40 ThinQ has an older 10 version while Moto G60s has Android 11 version.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G60s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. LG V40 ThinQ has a bit better looking display than Moto G60s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a better count of pixels per display inch.
The Moto G60s features a slightly better storage for apps and games than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Moto G60s shoots a little bit better videos and photos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting images or videos in low light situations and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G60s also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution.
The Moto G60s counts with a really longer battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.