Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2018-10-18 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting an 81.2 score against 77.4. Although the LG V40 ThinQ is newer than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, it is heavier and extremely thicker. The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a bigger display, a quite greater number of pixels per inch of display and a slightly higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. LG V40 ThinQ has a little bit better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a back facing camera with a 12 megapixels, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger camera sensor shooting higher quality pictures, a lot bigger camera aperture to capture better images in poorly lited environments and higher 60 fps video frame rates.
The LG V40 ThinQ and the Moto Z2 Force Edition have similar storage to install games and applications, both have the same internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V40 ThinQ has better battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 2730mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the LG V40 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.