Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2018-10-18 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z3, having an 81.2 score against 77.6. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but LG V40 ThinQ has an older 10 version and Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even being the best in this comparison, it must be told that it's also a little heavier and just a little bit thicker.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a little larger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and more pixels per display inch. The LG V40 ThinQ and the Motorola Moto Z3 count with incredibly similar storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, they have exactly the same internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. The LG V40 ThinQ features a slightly better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and a back facing camera with a 12 MP, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a much larger aperture to capture better images in poorly lited situations, a larger back camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality and better video frame rate.
The LG V40 ThinQ features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Moto Z3, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the LG V40 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.