Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is slightly better than Motorola One Action, having a score of 81.2 against 78.5. The LG V40 ThinQ body is just a little lighter and somewhat thinner than the Motorola One Action, although it was released about 10 months before. LG V40 ThinQ has just a bit better looking display than Motorola One Action, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch of display, a little bigger display and a better 1440 x 3120 resolution.
LG V40 ThinQ has a little bit better processing power than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory. LG V40 ThinQ takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a 12 megapixels resolution camera in the back, the LG V40 ThinQ also has higher video frame rate and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light captures and video.
The Motorola One Action counts with a little bit better memory to install applications and games than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Motorola One Action counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the LG V40 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.