Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than the Motorola razr (2022)'s global score of 81.1. The LG V40 ThinQ is a lighter phone than Motorola razr (2022), but both of them are equally thin. These devices use Android operating system, but the LG V40 ThinQ has the older 10 version while Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12 version.
Motorola razr (2022) has a bit better performance than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has more RAM. The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit better screen than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Motorola razr (2022) shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a way smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking images or videos in poorly lited environments and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a lot more megapixels back camera.
The Motorola razr (2022) features just a little bit longer battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 3500mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.