Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2, having a general score of 81.2 against 79.7. LG V40 ThinQ's construction is just a bit thinner and a little lighter than the OPPO Find X2, although it was released just a little further than a year before. Both phones in our current comparison work with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System).
OPPO Find X2 counts with a bit more vivid display than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a little higher 1440 x 3168px resolution and a little bit larger display. The OPPO Find X2 has just a little better processing power than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for apps and games than OPPO Find X2, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. OPPO Find X2 takes much better photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 also counts with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution back camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and pictures.
The OPPO Find X2 features improved battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 27% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.