Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Neo, having an 81.2 score against 76. Although LG V40 ThinQ is notably older than OPPO Find X3 Neo, it's construction is a little lighter and just a little bit thinner. These phones have Android operating system, but the LG V40 ThinQ has 10 version and OPPO Find X3 Neo has Android 11.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a bit sharper display than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bit larger screen. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
OPPO Find X3 Neo has a bit more powerful CPU than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a larger amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X3 Neo has a superior camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with a back camera with way more MP.
OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with longer battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, LG V40 ThinQ is also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.